Optical Interferometers College Of William Amp Mary-PDF Free Download

Optical Interferometers College of William amp Mary

2020 | 8 views | 9 Pages | 552.04 KB

Figure 1 shows the traditional setting for a Michelson interferometer. A beamsplitter (a glass plate which is partially silver-coated on the front surface and angled ...

Figure 1 shows the traditional setting for a Michelson interferometer A beamsplitter a glass plate which
is partially silver coated on the front surface and angled at 45 degrees splits the laser beam into two parts
of equal amplitude One beam that was initially transmitted by the beamsplitter travels to a fixed mirror
M1 and back again One half of this amplitude is then reflected from the partially silvered surface and
directed at 90 degrees toward the observer you will use a viewing screen At the same time the second
beam reflected by the beamsplitter travels at 90 degrees toward mirror M2 and back Since this beam
never travels through the glass beamsplitter plate its optical path length is shorter than for the first beam
To compensate for that it passing twice through a clear glass plate called the compensator plate that has
the same thickness At the beamsplitter one half of this light is transmitted to an observer overlapping with
the first beam and the total amplitude of the light at the screen is a combination of amplitude of the two
Etotal E1 E2 E0 E0 cos k l 1
Here k l is a phase shift optical delay between the two wavefronts caused by the difference in optical
pathlengths for the two beams l k 2 n is the wave number is the wavelength of light in vacuum
and n is the refractive index of the optical medium in our case air
Mirror M2 is mounted on a precision traveling platform Imagine that we adjust its position by turning
the micrometer screw such that the distance traversed on both arms is exactly identical Because the
thickness of the compensator plate and the beamsplitter are the same both wavefronts pass through the
same amount of glass and air so the pathlength of the light beams in both interferometer arms will be
exactly the same Therefore two fields will arrive in phase to the observer and their amplitudes will add
up constructively producing a bright spot on the viewing screen If now you turn the micrometer to offset
the length of one arm by a half of light wavelength l 2 they will acquire a relative phase of and
total destructive interference will occur
E1 E2 0 or E1 E2
It is easy to see that constructive interference happens when the difference between pathlengths in two
interferometer arms is equal to the integer number of wavelengths l m and destructive interference
corresponds to the half integer number of wavelengths l m 1 2 here m is an integer number Since
the wavelength of light is small 600 700 nm for a red laser Michelson interferometers are able to measure
distance variation with very good precision
In a Fabry Perot configuration input light field bounces between two closely spaced partially reflecting
surfaces creating a large number of reflections Interference of these multiple beams produces sharp spikes
in the transmission for certain light frequencies Thanks to the large number of interfering rays this type
of interferometer has extremely high resolution much better than for example a Michelson interferometer
For that reason Fabry Perot interferometers are widely used in telecommunications lasers and spectroscopy
to control and measure the wavelengths of light In this experiment we will take advantage of high spectral
resolution of the Fabry Perot interferometer to resolve two very closely spaces emission lines in Na spectra
by observing changes in a overlapping interference fringes from these two lines
A Fabry Perot interferometer consists of two parallel glass plates flat to better than 1 4 of an optical
wavelength and coated on the inner surfaces with a partially transmitting metallic layer Such two mirror
arrangement is normally called an optical cavity The light in a cavity by definition bounces back and forth
many time before escaping the idea of such a cavity is crucial for the construction of a laser Any light
transmitted through such cavity is a product of interference between beams transmitted at each bounce as
diagrammed in Figure 2 When the incident ray arrives at interface point A a fraction t is transmitted and
the remaining fraction r is reflected such that t r 1 this assumes no light is lost inside the cavity
The same thing happens at each of the points A B C D E F G H splitting the initial ray into parallel
rays AB CD EF GH etc Between adjacent ray pairs say AB and CD there is a path difference of
where BK is normal to CD In a development similar to that used for the Michelson interferometer you
can show that
Figure 2 Sequence of Reflection and Transmission for a ray arriving at the treated inner surfaces P1 P2
If this path difference produces constructive interference then is some integer multiple of namely
m 2d cos 4
This applies equally to ray pairs CD and EF EF and GH etc so that all parallel rays to the right of
P 2 will constructively interfere with one another when brought together
Issues of intensity of fringes contrast between fringes and dark background are addressed in Melissinos
Experiments in Modern Physics pp 309 312
Laser Safety
Never look directly at the laser beam Align the laser so that it is not at eye level Even a weak laser
beam can be dangerous for your eyes
Alignment of Machelson interferometer
Equipment needed Pasco precision interferometry kit a laser Na lamp adjustable hight platform
To simplify the alignment of a Michelson interferometer it is convenient to work with diverging optical
beams In this case an interference pattern will look like a set of concentric bright and dark circles since the
components of the diverging beam travel at slightly different angles and therefore acquire different phase
as illustrated in Figure 3 Suppose that the actual pathlength difference between two arms is d Then the
path length difference for two off axis rays arriving at the observer is l a b where a d cos and
Recalling that cos 2 2 cos 2 1 we obtain l 2d cos The two rays interfere constructively for any
angle c for which l 2d cos m m integer at the same time two beams traveling at the angle
d interfere destructively when l 2d cos m 1 2 m integer Because of the symmetry about
the normal direction to the mirrors this will mean that interference bright and dark fringes appears in a
circular shape If fringes are not circular it means simply that the mirrors are not parallel and additional
alignment of the interferometer is required
When the path length difference l is varied by moving one of the mirrors using the micrometer the
fringes appear to move As the micrometer is turned the condition for constructive and destructive
Figure 3 Explanation of circular fringes Notice that to simplify the figure we have unfold the interfer
ometer by neglecting the reflections on the beamsplitter
interference is alternately satisfied at any given angle If we fix our eyes on one particular spot and count for
example how many bright fringes pass that spot as we move mirror M2 by known distance we can determine
the wavelength of light in the media using the condition for constructive interference l 2d cos m
For simplicity we might concentrate on the center of the fringe bull s eye at 0 The equation above
for constructive interference then reduces to 2 l m m integer If X1 is the initial position of the
mirror M2 as measured on the micrometer and X2 is the final position after a number of fringes m has
been counted we have 2 X2 X1 m Then the laser wavelength is then given as
2 X2 X1 m 6
Using Pasco kit set up the interferometer as shown in Figure 1 using the components of Pasco precision
interferometry kit A mirrors M1 2 are correspondingly a movable and an adjustable mirror from the kit
Make initial alignment of the interferometer with a non diverging laser beam Adjust the beams so that it
is impinging on the beamsplitter and on the viewing screen Try to make the beams to hit near the center
of all the optics including both mirrors the compensator plate and beam splitter The interferometer has
leveling legs which can be adjusted Align the beams such that they overlap on the viewing screen
Then insert a convex lens after the laser to spread out the beam ideally the laser beam should be pass
through the center of the lens to preserve alignment Adjust the adjustable mirror slightly until you see the
interference fringes in the screen Continue make small adjustments until you see a clear bull s eye circular
pattern A word of caution sometimes dust on a mirror or imperfections of optical surfaces may produce
similar intensity patterns True interference disappears if you block one of the beam
Note before starting the measurements make sure you understand how to read the micrometer properly
Wavelength measurements using Michelson interferometer
Calibration of the interferometer
Record the initial reading on the micrometer Focus on a the central fringe and begin turning the micrometer
You will see that the fringes move for example the central spot will change from bright to dark to bright
again that is counted as one fringe Count a total of about m 100 fringes and record the new reading
on the micrometer
Each lab partner should make at least two independent measurements starting from different initial
positions of the micrometer For each trial approximately 100 fringes should be accurately counted and
related to an initial X1 and final X2 micrometer setting Make sure that the difference X2 X1 is consistent
between all the measurements Calculate the average value of the micrometer readings X2 X1
When your measurements are done ask the instructor how to measure the wavelength of the laser using
a commercial wavemeter Using this measurement and Equation 6 calculate the true distance traveled by
Figure 4 Micrometer readings The course scale is in mm and smallest division on the rotary dial is 1 m
same as 1 micron The final measurements is the sum of two
the mirror l and calibrate the micrometer i e figure out precisely what displacement corresponds to one
division of the micrometer screw dial
Experimental tips
1 Avoid touching the face of the front surface mirrors the beamsplitter and any other optical elements
2 Engage the micrometer with both hands as you turn maintaining positive torque
3 The person turning the micrometer should also do the counting of fringes It can be easier to count
them in bunches of 5 or 10 i e 100 fringes 10 bunches of 10 fringes
4 Before the initial position X1 is read make sure that the micrometer has engaged the drive screw There
can be a problem with backlash
5 Avoid hitting the table which can cause a sudden jump in the number of fringes
Measurement of the Ne lamp wavelength
A calibrated Machelson interferometer that you have just constructed can be used as a wavemeter to
determine the wavelength of different light sources In this experiment you will use it to measure the
wavelength of strong yellow sodium fluorescent light produced by the discharge lamp
Without changing the alignment of the interferometer i e without touching any mirrors remove the
focusing lens and carefully place the interferometer assembly on top of an adjustable hight platform such
that it is at the same level as the output of the lamp Since the light power in this case is much weaker
than for a laser you won t be able to use the viewing screen You will have to observe the interference
looking directly to the output beam unlike laser radiation the spontaneous emission of a discharge is not
dangerous However your eyes will get tired quickly Placing a diffuser plate in front of the lamp will make
the observations easier Since the interferometer is already aligned you should see the interference picture
Make small adjustments to make sure you see the center of the bull s eye
Repeat the same measurements as in the previous part by moving the mirror and counting the number
of fringes If it is hard to count 100 fringes you may reduce the number Again each lab partner should
make at least two independent measurements recording initial and final position of the micrometer
Figure 5 The Fabry Perot Interferometer For initial alignment the laser and the convex lens are used
instead of the Na lamp
Using the calibration done in the previous section calculate the true distance traveled by the mirror
in each measurements and use Equation 6 Calculate the wavelength of the Na light for each trial Then
calculate the average value and its experimental uncertainty Compare with the expected value of 589 nm
In reality the Na discharge lamp produce a doublet two spectral lines that are very close to each other
589 nm and 589 59 nm Do you thin you Michelson interferometer can resolve this small difference Hint
the answer is no we will use a Fabry Perot interferometer for that task
Alignment of the Fabry Perot interferometer
Disassemble the Michelson Interferometer and assemble the Fabry Perot interferometer as shown in Figure 5
First place the viewing screen behind the two partially reflecting mirrors P 1 and P 2 and adjust the mirrors
such that the multiple reflections on the screen overlap Then place a convex lens after the laser to spread out
the beam and make small adjustments until you see the concentric circles Is there any difference between
the thickness of the bright lines for two different interferometers Why
Loosed the screw that mounts the movable mirror and change the distance between the mirrors Realign
the interferometer again and comment on the difference in the interference picture Can you explain it
Align interferometer one more time such that the distance between two mirrors is 1 0 1 5 mm but make
sure the mirrors do not touch
Sodium doublet measurements
1 Turn off the laser remove the viewing screen and the lens and place the interferometer to the
adjustable hight platform With the diffuser sheet in front of the lamp check that you see the in
terference fringes when you look directly to the lamp through the interferometer If necessary adjust
the knobs on the adjustable mirror to get the best fringe pattern
2 Because the Na emission consists of two light at two close wavelengthes the interference picture consists
of two sets of rings one corresponding to fringes of 1 the other to those for 2 Move the mirror back
and forth by rotating the micrometer to identify two sets of ring Notice that they move at slightly
different rate due to the wavelength difference
3 Seek the START condition illustrated in Fig 6 such that all bright fringes are evenly spaced Note
that alternate fringes may be of somewhat different intensities Practice going through the fringe
conditions as shown in Fig 6 by turning the micrometer and viewing the relative movement of fringes
Do not be surprised if you have to move the micrometer quite a bit to return to the original condition
4 Turn the micrometer close to zero reading and then find a place on the micrometer d1 where you
have the START condition for fringes shown in Fig 6 Now advance the micrometer rapidly while
viewing the fringe pattern NO COUNTING OF FRINGES IS REQUIRED Note how the fringes
of one intensity are moving to overtake those of the other intensity in the manner of Fig 6 Keep
turning until the STOP pattern is achieved the same condition you started with Record the
micrometer reading as d2
5 Each lab partner should repeat this measurement at least one time and each group should have at
least three independent measurements Using the previous calibration convert
We chose the START condition the equally spaced two sets of rings such that for the given distance
between two mirrors d1 the bright fringes of 1 occur at the points of destructive interference for 2 Thus
the bull s eye center 0 we can write this down as
2d1 m1 1 m1 n 2 7
Here the integer n accounts for the fact that 1 2 and the 1 2 for the condition of destructive
interference for 2 at the center The STOP condition corresponds to the similar situation but the net
action of advancing by many fringes has been to increment the fringe count of 2 by one more than that of
2d2 m2 1 m2 n 2 8
Subtracting the two interference equations and solving for the distance traveled by the mirror d2 d1 we
Solving this for 1 2 and accepting as valid the approximation that 1 2 2 where is the
average of 1 and 2 589 26nm we obtain
Use this equation and your experimental measurements to calculate average value of Na doublet splitting
and its standard deviation Compare your result with the established value of N a 0 598 nm
Figure 6 The Sequence of fringe patterns encountered in the course of the measurements Note false colors
in your experiment the background is black and both sets of rings are bright yellow
Detection of Gravitational Waves
A Michelson interferometer can help to test the theory of relativity Gravity waves predicted by
the theory of relativity are ripples in the fabric of space and time produced by violent events in the distant
universe such as the collision of two black holes Gravitational waves are emitted by accelerating masses
much as electromagnetic waves are produced by accelerating charges and often travel to Earth The only
indirect evidence for these waves has been in the observation of the rotation of a binary pulsar for which
the 1993 Nobel Prize was awarded Laser Interferometry Gravitational wave Observatory LIGO sets
the ambitious goal to direct detection of gravitational wave The measuring tool in this project is a giant
Michelson interferometer Two mirrors hang 2 5 mi apart forming one arm of the interferometer and
two more mirrors make a second arm perpendicular to the first Laser light enters the arms through a beam
splitter located at the corner of the L dividing the light between the arms The light is allowed to bounce
between the mirrors repeatedly before it returns to the beam splitter If the two arms have identical lengths
then interference between the light beams returning to the beam splitter will direct all of the light back toward
the laser But if there is any difference between the lengths of the two arms some light will travel to where
it can be recorded by a photodetector
The space time ripples cause the distance measured by a light beam to change as the gravitational wave
passes by These changes are minute just 10 16 centimeters or one hundred millionth the diameter of
a hydrogen atom over the 2 5 mile length of the arm Yet they are enough to change the amount of light
falling on the photodetector which produces a signal defining how the light falling on changes over time LlGO
requires at least two widely separated detectors operated in unison to rule out false signals and confirm that
a gravitational wave has passed through the earth Three interferometers were built for LlGO two near
Figure 7 For more details see http www ligo caltech edu
Figure 8 For more details see http lisa nasa gov
Richland Washington and the other near Baton Rouge Louisiana
LIGO is the family of the largest existing Michelson interferometers but just wait for a few years until
LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna the first space gravitational wave detector is launched LISA
is essentially a space based Michelson interferometer three spacecrafts will be arranged in an approximately
equilateral triangle Light from the central spacecraft will be sent out to the other two spacecraft Each
spacecraft will contain freely floating test masses that will act as mirrors and reflect the light back to the
source spacecraft where it will hit a detector causing an interference pattern of alternating bright and dark
lines The spacecrafts will be positioned approximately 5 million kilometers from each other yet it will be
possible to detect any change in the distance between two test masses down to 10 picometers about 1 10th
the size of an atom

Related Books

Astrophysique observationnelle - Collège de France

Astrophysique observationnelle - Collège de France

performances of current optical interferometers and future designs », Observatoire de Haute Provence, septembre 2013. Nunez P., Labeyrie A. & Riaud P. « Towards Laser-Guide-Stars for Multi-Aperture Interferometry: an application to the hypertelescope », à paraître dans Monthly Notices, 2014.

Continue Reading...
23 Novembre 2004 Collège de France Spectroscopie et ...

23 Novembre 2004 Collège de France Spectroscopie et ...

23 Novembre 2004 Collège de France Atom Interferometers as Gravito-Inertial Sensors: Analogy between gravitation and electromagnetism g00 =1+h00 g ↓ G T T Metric tensor Newtonian potential Gravitoelectric field c h U g G G G − 2∇ 00 /2 =−∇ = e.m. 2 2 h00 2U/c 2g.x/c ~ V GG = =−

Continue Reading...
Fundamental Stellar Properties from Optical Interferometry

Fundamental Stellar Properties from Optical Interferometry

Areas where optical interferometry is making compelling contributions towards parameterizing the fundamental properties of cool stars include: Radius - The sub-milliarcsecond resolutions of modern optical interferometers allow for direct measure-ment of the linear sizes of nearby cool stars of all luminosity classes. Effective tem-

Continue Reading...
Femtosecond Laser Microprinting of a Polymer Optical Fiber ...

Femtosecond Laser Microprinting of a Polymer Optical Fiber ...

polymers Communication Femtosecond Laser Microprinting of a Polymer Optical Fiber Interferometer for High-Sensitivity Temperature Measurement Chi Li 1, Changrui Liao 1,*, Jia Wang 1, Zongsong Gan 2,3 and Yiping Wang 1 1 Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen ...

Continue Reading...
Winter College on Fibre Optics, Fibre Lasers and Sensors

Winter College on Fibre Optics, Fibre Lasers and Sensors

Interferometers Polarization control (active) Polarization switch Electrooptical fibers Couplers/Splitters Optical Taps Multiplexers/combiners Demultiplexers/splitters Fixed Add/drop Multiplexers Interleavers Photonic Lightwave Circuits [AWG] Twin Core Fibers Connectors. 2 ICTP – Winter college on fibre optics, fibre lasers and sensors 12-23 Feb 2007 Passive fiber components 2 W. Margulis ...

Continue Reading...
The optical fibre Sagnac interferometer: an overview of ...

The optical fibre Sagnac interferometer: an overview of ...

The optical fibre Sagnac interferometer: an overview of its principles and applications To cite this article: B Culshaw 2006 Meas. Sci. Technol. 17 R1 View the article online for updates and enhancements. Related content Fibre optic gyroscopes B Culshaw and I P Giles-Monomode optical fibre interferometers for precision measurement D A Jackson-

Continue Reading...
Theoferometer for High Accuracy Optical Alignment and ...

Theoferometer for High Accuracy Optical Alignment and ...

Theoferometer for High Accuracy Optical Alignment and Metrology Ronald Tolanda, Doug Levitona, Seth Koterbab aNASAIGoddard Space Flight Center, Code 551 Optics, Greenbelt, MD 20771 bConcordia College, 901 8th St S., Moorhead, MN 56562 ABSTRACT The accurate measurement of the orientation of optical parts and systems is a pressing problem for upcoming space missions, such as stellar ...

Continue Reading...
Sub-Hertz Optomechanically-Induced Transparency

Sub-Hertz Optomechanically-Induced Transparency

Optical interferometers with suspended mirrors are the archetype of all current audio-frequency gravitational-wave detectors. The radiation pressure interaction between the motion of the mirror and the circulating optical eld in such interferometers represents a pristine form of light-matter

Continue Reading...
Finesse Measurement in Fabry-Perot Interferometers

Finesse Measurement in Fabry-Perot Interferometers

ectivity of the optical ats is raised, so too does the amplitude of the standing wave increase; as such, the decrease in probability of transmission of an individual photon is counteracted by an increase in the number of photons trapped in the cavity. So long as the 3 3 Darrow: Finesse Measurement in Fabry-Perot Interferometers

Continue Reading...
This practice book contains PHYSICS TEST

This practice book contains PHYSICS TEST

and optical interferometers, dimen-sional analysis, fundamental applica-tions of probability and statistics) 9. SPECIALIZED TOPICS: Nuclear and Particle physics (e.g., nuclear properties, radioactive decay, fission and fusion, reactions, fundamental properties of elementary particles), Condensed Matter (e.g., crystal structure, x-ray ...

Continue Reading...
Members of the Core Proposing Team

Members of the Core Proposing Team

Collège de France & Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, 06460 St Vallier (France) [email protected] 33 4 93 09 29 95 Members of the Core Proposing Team: Denis Mourard, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur [email protected] Jean Schneider , Observatoire de Paris-Meudon [email protected] Introduction Hypertelescopes are innovative extended versions of optical stellar interferometers ...

Continue Reading...